Re: asm volatile statement reordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-10-17 04:42 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > GCC guesses wrong on occasion. It will remove code that has value that
> > > but does not produce an output because the language does not allow us
> > > to express it.
> > 
> > Yes, the compiler is bad at guessing what you mean.  It does not even
> > try; it only cares about what you *say*.
> 
> I've had both SIGILL probes and memory zeroizers removed by GCC. I was
> very clear about what I said should be done.
> 
> The language did not give me a way to tell GCC, please don't mess with
> this code and please ensure it executes like I've written it.

Optimization is just "messing with code".  If you don't like it, put your
code in a standalone translation unit and use -O0.  Modern C is not an
"advanced assembly language".

The compilers are not intelligent.  They don't know your intention.

> Jeff
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux