Re: Does GCC need a special switch for ADCX/ADOX?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-08-21 06:29 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2017-08-21 04:25 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > 
> > > Does GCC need a special switch for ADCX/ADOX?
> > 
> > On my Core i3 (ivybridge) -march=native is enough to generate ADCQ with
> > _addcarryx_u64.  And according to GCC testsuite, _addcarryx_u64 always
> > translates to ADCQ on x86-64 since all x86-64 CPU have it:
> > 
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/
> > adx-addcarryx64-3.c?revision=214860&view=markup>
> 
> Ack, thanks. Let me spin up another thread with the details and the
> [failed] result.

Sorry.  Some wrong online references lead me to believe that ADC were ADCX.
I'll try more switches.

> Jeff
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux