Re: prevent (pre_inc ...) from satisfying "movhi" RTL template constraints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Maxim,

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:39:53AM +0100, Maxim Blinov wrote:
> > (define_insn "pushhi_16"
> >  [(set (mem:HI (pre_inc:HI (reg:HI SP_REG)))
> >        (match_operand:HI 0 "general_operand" "rni"))]
> >  ""
> >  "push %0"
> > )

("i" matches everything "n" does; did you mean "rmi"?  If you did
mean "ri", you should use nonmemory_operand).

> My question is, why does the compiler match the above RTL code to
> my "movhi" template? I have not specified an auto {pre,post}
> inc/decremented ("<" or ">") operand constraint anywhere in the
> "movhi" template; thus, surely the template match should fail, if the
> RTL that is attempted to be matched contains such a *cremented
> expression?

Because your legitimate_address_p (or similar) is fine with it,
I suspect.


Segher



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux