On 2017-06-01 14:51:52 +0200, Toebs Douglass wrote: > On 01/06/17 14:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > No, the goal of -pedantic-errors is not to be a portability checker or > > conformance tester. > > > > It's to disable standard-conflicting GNU extensions so that you get an > > error when the standard requires a diagnostic. > > [snip] > > Thanks for that, Jonathan. > > I can't speak for others, but it clears things up for me. No, that's definitely *not* clear! I'm still waiting the answer for the strings longer than the C90 limit. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
