Re: GCC optimization bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lee Duhem <lee.duhem@xxxxxxxxx>, anubhav <anubhav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GCC optimization bug?
From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:29:34 +0000
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAOSer0CpSKoCZuPT8ePdVEKm52cq-3=F_8b14=Ev-UzraNfuCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8bd91f0702cba1bb8ea712e572a52c3b@cse.iitb.ac.in> <CAOSer0CpSKoCZuPT8ePdVEKm52cq-3=F_8b14=Ev-UzraNfuCA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0

On 17/01/17 10:20, Lee Duhem wrote:
> In C, integer overflow is an undefined behavior.

-fno-strict-overflow is supposed to fix that.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC optimization bug?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- GCC optimization bug?
  - From: anubhav
- Re: GCC optimization bug?
  - From: Lee Duhem

Prev by Date: Re: GCC optimization bug?
Next by Date: Re: GCC optimization bug?
Previous by thread: Re: GCC optimization bug?
Next by thread: Re: GCC optimization bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux