Re: -Wmissing-field-initializers got shot in the leg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30 December 2016 at 09:26, Georg GCC User wrote:

> No, it's nothing to do with that. The behaviour you've observed with
> designated initializers has been how it works since the warning option
> was first added back in 2004, see https://gcc.gnu.org/r85638

>> Is there some other way to make GCC warn, or will a change request
>> be in order?
>
> I think so, since the current behaviour is documented and intentional.

It seems like the change had been requested in 2009.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589

I have added my thoughts.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux