Re: Sed LLP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: GCC help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sed LLP
From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:24:57 +0200
In-reply-to: <VI1PR04MB2173B20112AB8AEC148A4D218CC20@VI1PR04MB2173.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR04MB2173B20112AB8AEC148A4D218CC20@VI1PR04MB2173.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40

On 03/10/2016 14:51, Quinlan Macdonald wrote:

> I have finally sent your pack. Please check the doc file attached
> here to get more information.

I'm not sure it makes sense to send virus-infected Microsoft Word
files to GCC users.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sed LLP
  - From: Andrew Haley

Prev by Date: RE: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC?
Next by Date: Re: Sed LLP
Previous by thread: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults
Next by thread: Re: Sed LLP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux