Re: Possible gcc bug in strict type aliasing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-09-26 10:32:14 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 25/09/16 22:46, David Brown wrote:
> 
> I think the bug is here:
> 
> >        temp = *t2p;      // Read as T2
> >        t1p2 = (T1*)t2p;  // Visible T2 to T1 pointer conversion
> >        *t1p2 = temp;     // Write as T1
> 
> 6.3.2.3 Pointers
> 
> 7 A pointer to an object type may be converted to a pointer to a
>   different object type. If the resulting pointer is not correctly
>   aligned for the referenced type, the behavior is undefined.
>   Otherwise, when converted back again, the result shall compare equal
>   to the original pointer.
> 
> Note that you have permission only to convert the pointer back to the
> original type and compare it.  You don't have permission to
> dereference it as a different type.  IMO your program is undefined.

I disagree. The above paragraph says nothing about dereferencing the
pointer; in particular, it does not disallow one to dereference it
as a different type. The restrictions about dereferencing are given
by 6.5#7 (itself based on 6.5#6, which defines the "effective type").
Moreover 6.5#7 restrictions are about write-read combinations, not
about read-write like in the above 3 lines of code.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux