Re: Fw: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/31/2016 10:57 AM, Toshi Morita wrote:
However, if the definition of pfoo is changed to:

const int * const pfoo = (const int * const 0x1234);


the optimization seems to fail:

The optimization is not valid in this case because the compiler cannot know that the object was declared const. It could well be mutable.

Florian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux