Re: Bug in template parsing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.06.2016 0:26, Marcel Keller wrote:
Hi,

Trying to compile the attached code with GCC 5.3.0 gives the error:

templ_bug.cpp: In function ‘void g()’:
templ_bug.cpp:15:12: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token
   T().f<t>();
            ^
templ_bug.cpp: In instantiation of ‘void g() [with T = A; int t = 0]’:
templ_bug.cpp:19:10:   required from here
templ_bug.cpp:15:8: error: invalid operands of types ‘<unresolved
overloaded function type>’ and ‘int’ to binary ‘operator<’
   T().f<t>();
        ^

However, if I uncomment the commented line, it works fine. I cannot
understand why this should make a difference. Is there a mistake in the
code or a bug in GCC?


According to [temp.names]/4:

"When the name of a member template specialization appears after . or -> in a postfix-expression or after a nested-name-specifier in a qualified-id, and the object expression of the postfix-expression is type-dependent or the nested-name-specifier in the qualified-id refers to a dependent type, but the name is not a member of the current instantiation (14.6.2.1), the member template name must be prefixed by the keyword template."

I.e., you should write:

T().template f<t>();

--
Mikhail Maltsev



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux