On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 14:24 +0200, Aurelien Buhrig wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > lto pass is correctly done. Maybe I would try upgrading the backend > to > a newer version, but it is a quite important workload... LTO works almost in a target independent way. You can try using a newer GCC version for a public target and see if it gives you the desired result. If so, upgrading might be a good alternative. Often you can just copy-paste your backend without major changes. Unless of course changes to other parts of the compiler have been made. Cheers, Oleg
