Re: option -mprfchw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: option -mprfchw
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 20:52:14 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
In-reply-to: <CAF1jjLtRusgaU8iB8jvExn9eyMTTKaEavDY12Cb6WapZH9BVnA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2

On 01/05/16 17:39, NightStrike wrote:

Ping 2?

It may be that nobody here knows the answer to this question. You may havemore luck writing to the dev list (gcc@) and CCing the AMD and x86-64maintainers. Or you may open a PR in bugzilla. Or both.


Cheers,
	Manuel.

References:
- option -mprfchw
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: option -mprfchw
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: option -mprfchw
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: option -mprfchw
  - From: NightStrike

Prev by Date: Re: mpfr / gmp dependency
Next by Date: classpath/tools/tools.zip:0:0: fatal error: not a valid Java .class file
Previous by thread: Re: option -mprfchw
Next by thread: missing things in c++/gcc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux