Hello, as you know, the source of gcc is quite complex, especially for someone who managed to go through their MS in Computer Science without taking a compiler class :) Where in the sources is the file foobar.o opened for writing in >gcc -c foobar.c -o foobar.o The reason why I am asking, if you care to know, is that the LD_PRELOAD trick for the above command, does intercept the open() syscall for (reading) foobar.c, but does not intercept the open() call for (writing) foobar.o . I know some version of open() is called for writing foobar.o because that is what >strace -fF gcc -c foobar.c -o foobar.o says. If the library containing open() were linked statically, then both would not show up. I also tried to intercept __open(), fopen(), creat(), and their 64-bit variants. Nothing. So I am stumped and I need to look at the sources to understand. Or perhaps if someone knows the answer, you can explain this to me. Thank you very much, Mark
