On 02/12/2016 04:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
For the C++ compilers version which recognize memcpy, is there a difference between calling memcpy via your own extern "C" declaration, and calling __builtin_memcpy?
Except in freestanding mode (with builtins disabled) I don't believe there is a difference. They both get expanded the same way (either inline or to a call to memcpy depending on arguments).
What about calling memcpy through a function which has a "memcpy" asm alias?
I'm not sure what asm alias you have in mind. If attribute alias, then In order to define one the aliased symbol must itself be defined in the same translation unit as the alias. That precludes defining an alias for memcpy. Martin
