Re: Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: staticx <mohamedboussaa3@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:55:17 +0000
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
In-reply-to: <1448046885038-1207871.post@n5.nabble.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 20/11/15 19:14, staticx wrote:

Hi Jon,

So to reproduce some how the same O2 behavior I should compile with the
following sequence (-O1 + list of O2 flags)?


https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#optimization-options

References:
- Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations
  - From: staticx
- Re: Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations
  - From: staticx

Prev by Date: Re: ICE: SEGFAULT in mem rtx - GCC-4.5.1
Next by Date: Re: How to devirtualize one class?
Previous by thread: Re: Flags turned on by GCC standard optimizations
Next by thread: Question about default optimizations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux