On 13 November 2015 at 09:31, Thomas Thorne <tafthorne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Good Morning, > > I have come across something that I feel a shortcoming in the warnings > that gcc issues when compiling some C++ code. Calling it a bug seems a > bit harsh so I thought I would ask this mailing list of their opinion > before raising an issue. When I use a template to perform some sscanf > work on a string I loose some of the -Wformat warnings about the > expected argument types. > > Here is a set of C++ code that demonstrates the warnings occurring for > sscanf and not happening for the template. This has nothing to do with templates, you get exactly the same behaviour (i.e. no warnings) if you replace the function template with: bool message_scanner(const char *message, const char *format, short int* i, char* c, float* f) { size_t num_scanned(sscanf(message,format,i, c, f)); bool got_them_all(num_scanned == 3); return got_them_all; } The problem is simply that the compiler can't check the call to sscanf unless the first argument is a string literal. You should be able to solve the problem by adding __attribute__((format(scanf, blah blah))) to your template function, which tells the compiler it requires a string literal that meets the scanf format rules. Then calls to your own sccanf wrapper can be checked (assuming you pass a string literal to the wrapper). The format attribute is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html