On 11/12/2015 12:03 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12 November 2015 at 16:38, Tim Prince wrote: >> I see that the current trunk chooses to configure so as to depend on a >> compatible nanosleep() regardless of the ability of the target system to >> support that (e.g. cygwin64). I haven't been able to see whether there >> is a configure option or a prerequisites download installation to take >> care of it. > We've been using nanosleep there pretty much unchanged for about three years. > > The only recent change is to check its return value and inspect errno. > >> The reported compile error has to do with undefined errno and associated >> macros in the nanosleep() call. Is there an include missing from the >> libstdc++ source where it calls nanosleep() ? > The missing include is fixed at r230266. Thanks -- Tim Prince
