Re: Optimisations and undefined behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:27:34AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Why not simply:
> >   unsigned y = x;
> >   return y*y*y;
> > ? This is an example where defined behavior is so easy to get...
> 
> But what if the result of y*y*y (an unsigned int) does not fit in
> an int?

That is implementation-defined. not undefined (6.3.1.3); GCC documents
it like this:

     For conversion to a type of width N, the value is reduced modulo
     2^N to be within range of the type; no signal is raised.


Segher



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux