Re: Consistency of function attributes between prototype and definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/02/2015 05:25 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
glibc has a preprocessor macro called internal_function which switches
to a different calling convention on certain targets (i386 uses stdcall
and regparams).  For non-K&R function definitions, the compiler enforces
that both the prototype declaration and the definition match.

When someone writes a patch on a different architecture than i386 and
forgets to specify internal_function on both prototype and definition,
the build will pass, even though i386 will not compile.

Is there a way to use a certain harmless attribute to detect this
mismatch even on architectures where internal_function has no effect?
I'm not aware of one, but perhaps one could be invented to cover this class of sanity checking.

jeff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux