I'm using 32-bit. Here are some of the differences:
***** dhry21.dump
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
12 .debug_line 00002562 00000000 00000000 0000b06e 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
13 .debug_str 00000c0a 00000000 00000000 0000d5d0 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
14 .debug_ranges 00000040 00000000 00000000 0000e1da 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
***** DHRY21_PC.DUMP
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
12 .debug_line 0000243c 00000000 00000000 0000b06e 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
13 .debug_str 00000bd2 00000000 00000000 0000d4aa 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
14 .debug_ranges 00000040 00000000 00000000 0000e07c 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
*****
***** dhry21.dump
a: 0104 mv sp,ra
c: 031a j 192 <_ftext-0x1e6e>
e: 0000 unimp
10: db0c lw a1,48(a4)
12: 0001 0x1
14: b000 fld s0,32(s0)
***** DHRY21_PC.DUMP
a: 0104 mv sp,ra
c: 0312 j 190 <_ftext-0x1e70>
e: 0000 unimp
10: 110c add sp,sp,gp
12: 0002 j 12 <_ftext-0x1fee>
14: b000 fld s0,32(s0)
*****
***** dhry21.dump
26: 0074 0x74
28: 00043d03 0x43d03
2c: 0200 jr tp
***** DHRY21_PC.DUMP
26: 0074 0x74
28: 00043503 0x43503
2c: 0200 jr tp
*****
***** dhry21.dump
42: 0408 mv s0,sp
44: 0262 j 15c <_ftext-0x1ea4>
46: 0000 unimp
***** DHRY21_PC.DUMP
42: 0408 mv s0,sp
44: 01fe j 142 <_ftext-0x1ebe>
46: 0000 unimp
*****
***** dhry21.dump
48: 0104 mv sp,ra
4a: c506 addi a0,a0,1
4c: 0002 j 4c <_ftext-0x1fb4>
***** DHRY21_PC.DUMP
48: 0104 mv sp,ra
4a: bd06 lui s10,0xfffe1
4c: 0002 j 4c <_ftext-0x1fb4>
*****
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:02 AM, <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What difference do you mean and are you using 64-bit or 32-bit.
>
> I'd expect either to be different and would not know how to fix that for 32-bit if it is different.
>
> But for 64-bit it would not be correct to make them the same, even if you knew how. Windows uses its own ABI for x86-64 and not the original standard ABI that Linux uses.
>
>
> On 09/29/15, Helen Tang wrote:
>
> I built a gcc toolchain with same target and architecture on Ubuntu
> and on Windows(Cygwin). The results from objdump are different. Is
> there a way to make
> them the same?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Helen
