Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 12:04, Kostas Savvidis wrote:
>> The online documentation contains the attached passage as part of the "C-Extensions” chapter. There are no actual machines which have an " integer mode wide enough to hold 128 bits” as the document puts it.
>
> It's not talking about machine integers, it's talking about GCC
> integer modes. Several targets support that.
>
>> This would be a harmless confusion if it didn’t go on to say “… long long integer less than 128 bits wide” (???!!!) Whereas in reality "long long int” is 64 bits everywhere i have seen.
>
>
> Read it more carefully, it says you can't express an integer constant
> of type __int128 on such platforms.

Is there a way to detect the presence or availability of __int128 via
preprocessor macros?

Jeff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux