Re: 128-bit integer - nonsensical documentation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 August 2015 at 13:32, Kostas Savvidis wrote:
> I sense there is a consensus that
> 1) the 128bit integer is emulated emulated on 64-bit platforms, not available on 32-bit platforms, and is not native anywhere
> 2) the long long int is 64-bits everywhere so you can *NEVER* do what the document seems to suggest one *MIGHT* be able to do —  input a 128-bit constant
>
> To me, this would justify rewriting the documentation.

I disagree, it is correct as written. There may be ports outside the
GCC tree where you can write a 128-bit constant (there may even be
some in the tree, I don't know).


> My personal lament is that i still cannot find out anywhere if it is available on all 64-bit platforms or on intel only.

It's not Intel only, it works fine on powerpc64le, for example.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux