Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 06:05:39 -0500
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: john smith <wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH6eHdQUBc_Rh_zcTD1hKvCV=XPt9KHupGgFcT2aks-fu=BS3g@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> because alignments must be a power of 2.

That is true in C++, but not true in C or even POSIX afaics?


Segher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
  - From: john smith
- Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
  - From: john smith
- Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Prev by Date: Re: Error building gcc-5.* with threads=win32
Next by Date: static functions appearing in the symbol table
Previous by thread: Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
Next by thread: Re: are statically allocated structs always aligned to a machine word on x86/x86_64?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux