On 06/19/2015 08:01 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/19/2015 07:50 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Avi Kivity wrote:
I wonder if gcc can give a better diagnostic here. Instead of
./variadic-function-nonlast.cc:9:15: note: candidate expects 1
argument, 4 provided
it might say,
./variadic-function-nonlast.cc:9:15: note: candidate expects 1
argument, 4 provided
./variadic-function-nonlast.cc:9:15: note: parameter pack `X' in
non-last position deduced as empty parameter pack
I have no idea how hard that would be, but it could make sense. Feel
free to file an enhancement PR on gcc's bugzilla. Do describe
precisely the feature you are asking for. Also, it would help if you
could add to that report the error messages from other compilers, for
inspiration.
Deducing 'clang' for 'other compilers', I find that its error message
is no better. I'll file a report.
For reference, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66601.
