Hi Simon,
On 17 Jun 2015, at 21:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 June 2015 at 20:43, Simon Wright wrote:
>> Any workrounds?
>
> yes, it doesn't work with current sources - I have a patch to make it
> work for linkers without -Bdynamic/Bstatic
NOTE: this is from my local "WIP" branch and hasn't been reviewed upstream - whilst it Works For Me(tm), it might not be acceptable there.
let me know if it works for you,
cheers
Iain
----
>From 61318a3c0931b5aa64dfd5972fd751711f592c04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Iain Sandoe <iain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 15:49:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Pass on -static-libstdc++ for platforms without
Bstatic/dynamic.
---
gcc/cp/g++spec.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/g++spec.c b/gcc/cp/g++spec.c
index 6536d7e..48a9708 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/g++spec.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/g++spec.c
@@ -363,6 +363,15 @@ lang_specific_driver (struct cl_decoded_option **in_decoded_options,
&new_decoded_options[j]);
j++;
}
+#else
+ /* For linkers that don't support Bstatic/dynamic push the flag back
+ so that spec substitution can see it. */
+ if (library > 1 && !static_link)
+ {
+ generate_option (OPT_static_libstdc__, NULL, 0, CL_DRIVER,
+ &new_decoded_options[j]);
+ j++;
+ }
#endif
}
if (saw_math)
--
2.2.1
