Re: Are arrays guaranteed to be affected by a "memory" clobber?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/10/2015 09:46 PM, Sebastian wrote:
> The reason why I would like to avoid the volatile qualifier:

> As soon as I use it once, I must use it in all functions which get a
> pointer to the buffer. So I can't reuse these functions for other
> arrays.

> With other variables, this is not so serious - you can assign the
> value of a volatile variable to a temporary variable, or to a
> parameter, without trouble. Only with pointers/arrays, this becomes
> a problem.

I'd use a full memory barrier.  __sync_synchronize() or one of the
__atomic fences.  Even if your processor does not use a relaxed
memory model, this guarantees that no memory operations will not
be moved  across the barrier.

Andrew.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux