Re: gcc: why is "abcdef"[3] not a constant (error: initializer element is not constant)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

sorry, it was not my intention to complain about gcc and I never said it's a
defect. I thought this is a help forum and so I thought I can get a hint or
trick how to work-around this. I really like gcc and you make a great job
with it.

I just did not understand the idea behind this restriction. Perhaps there is
a good reason (beside the standard) for this.

Nevertheless I prefer friendly answers, also if you do not agree or think my
question is silly.
Btw., I develop C code since ~30 years (7 of them in the same company as
Dennis Ritchie) ... 

Cheers,
Markus



--
View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/gcc-why-is-abcdef-3-not-a-constant-error-initializer-element-is-not-constant-tp1146945p1147787.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux