On 7 April 2015 at 13:58, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 05/04/15 21:33, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >> >> ../test/unittests/compiler/simplified-operator-unittest.cc:23:61: note: a >> field of same name but different type is defined in another translation unit >> const Operator* (SimplifiedOperatorBuilder::*constructor)(); >> ^ >> /tmp/cc8drsSQ.s: Assembler messages: >> /tmp/cc8drsSQ.s:69493: Error: offset out of range >> /tmp/cc8drsSQ.s:69639: Error: offset out of range > > > Hi Prathamesh, > > Last time I saw this error, it was because some define_insn in the arm > backend had the wrong 'length' attribute. In particular, if the > 'length' attribute underestimates the true length of the instruction > then the compiler may try to pack too many instructions into between > a branch and a label, causing this error. If there is a way to get a > preprocessed file for this, compiling with -dp to annotate the assembly > with the define_insn patterns used and the 'length' attribute should > help with tracking this down, if that is indeed what's the problem. > Hi Kyrill, Sorry for late response, the assembly corresponds to inline assembly in src/arm/cpu-arm.cc. I have filed this as PR65778. Thank you, Prathamesh > Kyrill >
