On 3 April 2015 at 16:08, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I'm really curious to learn what is right in this case... This is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 The C++11 standard clarified the behaviour here, so that the member variable foo::name should not be a valid lookup result for the nested-name-qualifier in foo::name::one, because there is no way that the integer foo::name' can be used as a qualifier. 3.4.3 [basic.lookup.qual] p1: "If a :: scope resolution operator in a nested-name-specifier is not preceded by a decltype-specifier, lookup of the name preceding that :: considers only namespaces, types, and templates whose specializations are types."
