Re: use of const keyword

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please refer http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3025050/error-initializer-element-is-not-constant-when-trying-to-initialize-variable-w

"All the expressions in an initializer for an object that has static
storage duration shall be constant expressions or string literals."

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Yu Sheng Oh <humbleoh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> const int is not a constant in c, although it is in c++.
> to initialize a const int, you have to use literal values.
>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:43 PM, bostjanv <bostjanv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am verifying a simple fact concerning the use of the const keyword.
>>
>> I wrote the following simple program
>>
>>
>> ============================
>>
>> const int a=10;
>> const int b=a;
>>
>> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>> }
>> ============================
>>
>> I tried it out with gcc, version 4.7.2 on Debian 7, and the result was the
>> following:
>>
>> ============================
>> bostjan@wwpecker-5-deb:~/workspace/OB2/src$ cc   -c -o test.o test.c
>> test.c:3:1: error: initializer element is not constant
>> b
>> ============================
>>
>> QUESTION: Is there a way to initialize a const to the value of another
>> const?
>> Regards,
>> bostjanv
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/use-of-const-keyword-tp1098889.html
>> Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux