On 21 November 2014 14:25, Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, everybody > > I have already looked for an answer to my question on stackoverflow, finding > this > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13649061/manual-select-overloaded-function-for-rvalue-or-lvalue-type > > and also looked among the known gcc bugs (without finding something useful); > I have also read the standard as carefully as I can... > > so the question is: > > are known reasons leading the following silly code > > template <typename Z> void f(Z& z) {} > template <typename Z> void f(Z&& z) {} > > int main() > { > double x = 0; > f(x); > f(0.0); > } > > not being compiled by gcc 4.8.3 (without a const qualifier > in the lvalue-reference parameter of the first overload) while clang 3.4 > does? It's a bug, it works in GCC 4.9
