std::copy() optimization, gcc vs clang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

I'm curious the thoughts of GCC developers about this topic:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13128430/why-is-stdcopy-5x-slower-than-memcpy-in-my-test-program


Clang in this case optimizing better than GCC.
Is there any reason why GCC does not perform the same optimization?

Thanks.


--
Regards, niXman
___________________________________________________
Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/
___________________________________________________
Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux