Immediate offset in array index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I'm trying to understand the following code-gen difference in the following code:

#ifdef BEFORE
typedef int arr_2[4][5];
#else
typedef int arr_2[4][4];
#endif

void foo (arr_2 a2, int i, int j)
{
  a2[i + 2][j] = 2;
}

The code-gen using a mainline gcc -O2 -DBEFORE is:

        movslq  %esi, %rsi
        movslq  %edx, %rdx
        leaq    (%rsi,%rsi,4), %rax
        leaq    40(%rdi,%rax,4), %rax
        movl    $2, (%rax,%rdx,4)
        ret

and -O2 is:

        movslq  %esi, %rsi
        movslq  %edx, %rdx
        addq    $2, %rsi
        salq    $4, %rsi
        addq    %rdi, %rsi
        movl    $2, (%rsi,%rdx,4)
        ret

When the typedef is arr_2[4][5], the compiler distributes (i + 2) * 20 to i * 20 + 40, while not doing the distribution when the typedef is arr_2[4][4].

The -fdump-tree-original dumps already diff, so I guess that it is the parser which does something interesting.

Can anyone enlighten me that which part of the parser I shall further look into to get a better understanding of the code-gen difference?

Regards,
Yufeng

p.s.

diff of the -fdump-tree-original

-  (*(a2 + ((sizetype) ((long unsigned int) i * 20) + 40)))[j] = 2;
+  (*(a2 + ((sizetype) i + 2) * 16))[j] = 2;






[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux