On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 31 October 2013 17:48, Jędrzej Dudkiewicz wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 31 October 2013 17:19, Jędrzej Dudkiewicz wrote: >>>> >>>> Even as a infix/suffix? I thought that double underscore is reserved >>>> only if it is used as a prefix? >>> >>> No, a double underscore anywhere makes it a reserved name. >>> >>> — Each name that contains a double underscore _ _ or begins with an >>> underscore followed by an uppercase letter (2.12) is reserved to the >>> implementation for any use. >> >> Thanks. Is it from c++11 or c++98? I'm pretty certain that when I read >> it last time it read only "begins with". But it seems that my memory >> ain't that good after all, eh? > > C++98. > > IIRC double underscore are not reserved in C except at the beginning > of a name, so maybe that's what you're thinking of. Yes, it seems that what I rememeber is C rule. Have you any idea why is double-underscore reserved inside an identifier? I understand prefix and can imagine reasons for suffix, but infix is totally beyond me. -- Jędrzej Dudkiewicz I really hate this damn machine, I wish that they would sell it. It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it.
