C++11 final classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: C++11 final classes
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:25:42 +0200
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

Are C++11 final classes really final, or is it still possible to definea derived class through some hack without violating language rules?

It seems we devirtualize calls to virtual members of final classes insome cases, so I assume final is really final, but I'm not sure. :-)


--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++11 final classes
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Prev by Date: Re: Private virtual function overridden as public compiles and runs (bug?)
Next by Date: Re: C++11 final classes
Previous by thread: Private virtual function overridden as public compiles and runs (bug?)
Next by thread: Re: C++11 final classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux