Re: how to make gcc warn about arithmetic signed overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, James K. Lowden
<jklowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Regarding the OP's query
>
>> > int r = ab * bc;
>
> although the provided example is simple enough, it's the compiler's
> job is to generate object code, not to do static analysis.
>
> Even if the values are const, in the general case they could be
> modified by another module or another thread.  The compiler simply
> doesn't have enough information to warn of every runtime overflow.

I believe the CPU overflow flag is updated after most integer
arithmetic instructions.  Does GCC have any facility for checking this
flag after each integer operation?  This would be a runtime check, of
course, not a compile time check.

--Dave




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux