Hello, I have the feeling this is a problem with my understand of restrict so bear with me. Consider the following: typedef short int16_t; typedef int16_t c16mat4by4[10/*rows*/][10/*columns*/]; void nofmat4x4mul_v6(c16mat4by4 C_out[], c16mat4by4 D_out[], c16mat4by4 A[], c16mat4by4 B[]) { c16mat4by4 * restrict arow_p = (c16mat4by4 *)&(A[0][0][0]); c16mat4by4 * restrict brow_p = (c16mat4by4 *)&(B[0][0][0]); c16mat4by4 * restrict crow_p = (c16mat4by4 *)&(C_out[0][0][0]); c16mat4by4 * restrict drow_p = (c16mat4by4 *)&(D_out[0][0][0]); for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) for (int z = 0; z < 5; z++) { crow_p[i][j][z] = brow_p[i][j][z] + arow_p[i][j][z]; drow_p[i][j][z] = brow_p[i][j][z]; } } I would assume that at each cycle brow_p[i][j][z] would only be loaded once due to brow_p and crow_p being marked as restrict. However, this doesn't happen under my port on 4.8.1. I confirmed it doesn't happen either on v850 (compiled with `gcc-v850/gcc/cc1 -O2 -std=c99 -o- restrict.c -fpreprocessed'): .L5: lh %r2,0(%r4,%r1) ah %r2,0(%r12,%r1) sth %r2,0(%r11,%r1) lh %r2,0(%r4,%r1) sth %r2,0(%r5,%r1) I would have thought the second lh would have been unnecessary. This means either alias analysis is wrong or my understanding of restrict in this case is wrong. I bet on the latter and that's why this is in gcc-help. Cheers, Paulo Matos