Re: Backend insn recog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes you're right, I realized it is 'recog' and indeed I forgot to
allow moving symbol_ref in 'movsi' in the predicate.
Thanks

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2013/8/19 Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi, asking bluntly, what does it mean if I am running into
>>
>> recog.c:extract_insn:fatal_insn_not_found (insn);
>>
>> ? Does this mean that there are some constraints that don't satisfy
>> something that the predicates allowed?
>
> If so, then the message should be "insn does not satisfy its constraints".
>
> In your case, I think there produces an insn that cannot be matched by
> any instruction patterns in your target.md.  Either it does not
> satisfy predicates,
> or is rejected by condition of the insn pattern.
>
>
> Best regards,
> jasonwucj




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux