Re: GIMPLE pass - Assignment evaluation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc ! Thanks for the reply.

I tried -O1 and higher optimization levels but I don't see any
difference. This is how I am building and loading my plugin...

g++ -I`g++ -print-file-name=plugin`/include -fPIC -shared -O1
gimple_pass.c -o plugin.so
g++ -fplugin=/home/sandeep/myplugin/gimple/plugin.so -O1 -c test.c

Am I supposed to use "-O1" differently to invoke the CCP pass?

Regards,
Sandeep.

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sandeep K Chaudhary wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I am writing a GIMPLE pass in which I need to inspect the assignments.
>> For example, for the below statements, I need to find the value of the
>> second and third assignments which are '2' and '7'.
>>
>> VAR1 = 1;
>> VAR1++;
>> VAR1 = VAR1 + 5;
>>
>> But the GIMPLE IR only has the following statements i.e. no optimization.
>>
>>  VAR1_2 = 1;
>>  VAR1_3 = VAR1_2 + 1;
>>  VAR1_4 = VAR1_3 + 5;
>>
>> How can I make it perform calculations on RHS? Are there some flags
>> that I can enable?
>
>
> -O1 (or higher) enables the CCP pass which propagates the constants. Note
> that only the last value will be left after that. If you need the
> intermediate ones for some reason, maybe you could look into the CCP pass
> and modify it for your needs?
>
> --
> Marc Glisse



-- 
Thanks and regards,
Sandeep K Chaudhary.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux