Re[2]: Why "'X' used but never defined" is a warning and not error in gcc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OE> On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 14:19 +0400, Ilya Basin wrote:
>> test.c:
>>     static void foo();
>>     
>>     void bar() {
>>         foo();
>>     }
>> 
>> $ gcc -c test.c
>> test.c:1: warning: 'foo' used but never defined
>> 
>> Why warning and not error? Another *.o can refer this static function?
>> 

OE> No, another .o can't refer to this static function.  Static functions
OE> are visible only in the translation unit where they are defined.

OE> The code above will generate a symbol reference to 'foo', i.e. a
OE> function call to a non-static function.  If it is defined in some
OE> other .o and linked together, the 'foo' from the other .o will be used.

OE> Cheers,
OE> Oleg


Is there a flag to turn this warning into an error? Is there a common
way to find the warning flag from a message?


-- 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux