Re: __gthread* on vxworks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/26/2012 8:56 PM, rbmj wrote:
Hi all,

Sorry, I forgot to phrase my post in the form of a question...

Is this what you're supposed to do? Or am I misunderstanding how this whole file works? Those implicit definition warnings aren't really a good sign (in general), so I'm not sure if this is what is supposed to happen.

Also, is this the correct way to take care of the mis-configuration? It works ok for libstdc++-v3, but if I try to compile libfortran stuff gets *really* screwed up.


Compiling gcc with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration (needed as
warnings for implicit declaration are causing mis-configuration) shows
that vxlib-tls.c still references __gthread*tsd*, but the only remaining
declarations are to __gthread*tls*.  I added a conditional declaration
of the __gthread*tsd* functions, and also noticed that one of the calls
to __gthread_tsd_leave_dtor_context doesn't pass tcb.

Also, it says that these functions are provided by the kernel, but I
haven't been able to find any documentation to confirm this.  Can
someone confirm that these are in fact provided by the kernel?

I'm citing http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01314.html for
the old prototypes.

The attached patch adds both the conditional declarations (on __RTP__)
and the minor change to the function call.

Robert Mason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux