Re: Why atomic::is_lock_free() is not a constexpr and/or static function?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why atomic::is_lock_free() is not a constexpr and/or static function?
From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:39:24 +0400
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys

If anyone is interested:
https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/std-discussion/A09LcYQkkHc

-- 
Regards,
niXman
___________________________________________________
Dual-target(32 & 64 bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64 bit Windows:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/

Prev by Date: Re: Trouble with gcc -B option
Next by Date: GCC 3.4.6 Install
Previous by thread: Why atomic::is_lock_free() is not a constexpr and/or static function?
Next by thread: Failing to compile GCC 4.7.1 on Windows with MinGW.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux