I have gone through all of this, and found no problems. gen-fib doesn't seem to be a command that runs from prompt. Furthermore, I have gotten rid of the gen-fib.h file, and have exactly the same issue as outlined previously (here). Is there anyone who can get me further past these errors? > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:59:12 +0000 > Subject: Re: Almost successfull compiling GCJ, however.. > From: dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx > To: stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx > CC: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx > > On 8 March 2012 08:18, Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > When I remove fib_table.h, > > > > and attempt to make; again inside objdir/ > > > > I get exactly the same error message as before, just earlier on: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > fib2_ui.c:76:29: error: 'FIB_TABLE_LIMIT' undeclared (first use in this function) > > fib2_ui.c:76:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > make[5] *** [fib2_ui.lo] Error 1 > > make[5] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp/mpn' > > make[4] ***all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[4] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp' > > make[3] *** [all] Error 2 > > make[3] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir/gmp' > > make[2] *** [all-stage1-gmp] Error 2 > > make[2] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir' > > make[1] *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 > > make[1] Leaving directory '/home/User/gcc-4.6.2/objdir' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It's been suggested already, but I can't see where you confirmed you'd > done it - have you tried deleting your > source directory and re-un-zipping the original source before you do anything? > > It's possible you have some corruption of the source tree caused by > running configure within it previously. > > And please copy and paste the commands and the output after doing > this, as it looks like you're re-copying > output messages from old emails, not from your latest attempts. > > David P.
