LTO for shared libs?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
:
gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: LTO for shared libs?
From
: Neal Becker <
ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:50:56 -0500
Comment
: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment
: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1329223889; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Received:To:From:Subject:Date:Lines:Message-ID:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent:Mailing-List: Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=kFc76Kjs+Fj7OqDpY1VyVOes7xI=; b=f9nFskhvvCwPy/FVg8m8/WQHLahQJ3Xel0ZxPl1oxzpqe6oB0RP3hptp7wDXVZ 3qgT0pZMrH4pf+Y41tWy0I432R4B864flInoEwwUa3kkDkhEC/eGO8CSil774zbZ ARzDS1Z1es8XPc1bl2m9jZsVuZk2KiIUlP7QbfEGgB2Us=
User-agent
: KNode/4.8.0
Can LTO be used to build shared libs? Would it be useful?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: LTO for shared libs?
From:
David Brown
Prev by Date:
Re: Cross compiling for the 1750A
Next by Date:
g++ compile error in unused template
Previous by thread:
best practice to handle unused variables depending on macros
Next by thread:
Re: LTO for shared libs?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]
