libmudflap and fortify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: GCC Users List <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: libmudflap and fortify
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:47:59 -0500
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1327898908; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:Subject: From:To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=O5g0+3VkvY11HaR0tfKxzVbBPHQ=; b=ru3ROHty5tOESS9 1VYLC/sTz0CHMT8T6J0v/LfZIqWwnx7WCGmY46mpwwkFFX1vQoXqYp7lN05aglul xL13nEFXzp8r6ZaNKeHkuExBO6eCFYfKwBHZxagteC/VX2Y36LihzplNDrICUuIw SrQjvHo2PoSnpSvzNism+dcZ+YIA=
Reply-to: noloader@xxxxxxxxx

Hi All,

Is there any contention between libmudflap
(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Mudflap_Pointer_Debugging) and fortify? Can
they be safely incorporated into the same binary without causing
problems for one another?

Jeff

Prev by Date: Re: Error building libgcc: missing setting for CPP
Next by Date: Regarding gcc compile
Previous by thread: Error building libgcc: missing setting for CPP
Next by thread: Regarding gcc compile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux