Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO
From: Scott Meyers <NeverRead@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:22:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <mcrehvxzadm.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <jcrthc$3b8$1@dough.gmane.org> <mcrfwgd50qd.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <jct785$4jb$1@dough.gmane.org> <mcrehvxzadm.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Mnenhy/0.8.4 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 12/21/2011 5:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

Yes, by the time it matters in the compiler, probabilities are
probabilities wherever they come from.


Makes sense, thanks.

Scott

References:
- __builtin_expect vs. PGO
  - From: Scott Meyers
- Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO
  - From: Scott Meyers
- Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Prev by Date: Re: Floating point performance issue
Next by Date: gcc-ar/gcc-nm/gcc-ranlib what this?
Previous by thread: Re: __builtin_expect vs. PGO
Next by thread: microblaze: error while loading shared libraries: libmpc.so.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux