I think, it's better to discuss here syntax and its semantics and then form common opinion. I can sketch my vision of this enhancement. 2011/11/26 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>: > David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Do you think it makes sense to file the enhancement request as I >> described in my post, or is it better to discuss it more in the >> mailing lists (either this one, or the gcc development list)? It's a >> feature I'd like to see implemented, but I don't want to clutter the >> bugzilla with a request if you think it is highly unlikely to be >> implemented - >> then it just wastes time for everyone. > > As with all gcc enhancements, the best way to make it happen is to do it > yourself. I think that if somebody produced a clean patch for this > functionality, it would be accepted. But it's true that it wouldn't > hurt to raise it on the mailing list to see if somebody is strongly > opposed to it. > > >> And for filing a request, >> would you prefer me to give a suggestion for the syntax and the effect >> it would have, or is it better to leave it open until someone >> interested in implementing it forms an opinion? > > It helps to have a suggestion for the syntax. > > Ian > -- С уважением, Владимир
