Re: Empty statement warning!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/11/2011 13:25, Agnar Renolen wrote:
I'm sometimes doing the obvious mistake of adding a ";" after an
if-statement.

if (<expression>); DoSomething();

This error sometimes causes weird behaviour of the program, and are
hard to spot in the code.

I once read a recommendation that you should always add curly braces,
even if for single statement blocks:

if (<expression>); { DoSomething(); }

...as this would normally cause a good compiler to issue a warning.


That's not why you should use braces. The main reasons are to avoid it being unclear what is in the scope of the "if", especially if the statement is on a separate line, and to avoid problems if DoSomething() happened to be a macro.

Personally, I think it is a strange sort of typo to add a semicolon after the "if" here, and I wouldn't rate it as a common problem (unlike mixups with "=" and "==", for example). But maybe you see it more often.

But, using XCode on Mac (built on top of  GCC) I'm not warned for
these errors, and I can't find an option in Xcode to enable such a
warning.

Is there another way to make gcc issue a warning for empty statements
such as the one above (I know it's legal C / C++ code, but it's use
is fairly narrow I would say).


I thought XCode used lvm rather than gcc?

Anyway, for gcc you need to have the appropriate warnings enabled. In this case it's "-Wempty-body", which you get automatically with "-Wextra". Some gcc warnings are only active when you have enabled at least some optimisation, but I think this one will always work.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux