How 'experimental' is -std=c++0x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-std=c++0x support in gcc is said to be 'experimental'. Even a macro used to
detect c++0x is __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__.

How experimental is 'experimental'? Does it mean that gcc has not much test
coverage with -std=c++0x compared to without? Does it mean there's a much
high chance of getting incorrect generated code even with source code that's
c++98?


-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-%27experimental%27-is--std%3Dc%2B%2B0x-tp32857653p32857653.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux