Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 10/31/2011 01:26 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> This seems blatantly wrong. At what point does one throw out the result
>> of
>> a bootstrap as not-acceptable ? With any non-zero value for "unexpected
>> failures" ?
>
> There's no simple answer.
>
> You need to look at the log to see what's going wrong, and run a few
> of the test cases.  There's probably a common cause.
>
> Andrew.

Also, on two different architectures I see similarly poor results. Here
are the sparc results :

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/msg03531.html

That is pretty ugly for gcc results.


-- 
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Dennis Clarke           | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   | Respect for open standards.       |
+-------------------------+-----------------------------------+



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux